Resources

Competency guide

Inclusion competency

Inclusion means creating fair opportunities for people to contribute and considering perspectives that could materially affect the outcome.

Published by Peasy HRPublished 18 Aug 2026Updated 18 Aug 2026

Short answer

Inclusion means creating fair opportunities for people to contribute and considering perspectives that could materially affect the outcome.

About Inclusion

Creates fair opportunities for people to contribute and considers perspectives that affect the outcome. Inclusion is evidenced in work practices and decisions, not inferred from intent, identity, sociability, or attendance at activities.

Use this competency for

  • Assessing whether work practices enable relevant people to participate and influence outcomes fairly.
  • Setting expectations for identifying exclusion risks in decisions, processes, and shared environments.

Do not use this competency for

  • Do not use it to score identity, personal beliefs, cultural fit, or disclosure of private experiences.

Important distinctions

Collaboration

Collaboration joins contributions toward shared outcomes. Inclusion asks whether access to contribute and influence is fair.

Respect

Respect concerns how people are treated. Inclusion also examines structures, access, and whose relevant perspective affects a choice.

Expectations by level

IC1

Uses inclusive team practices

Uses established inclusive practices in defined work and seeks guidance when participation needs or exclusion risks are unclear.

Observable behaviors

  • Shares necessary context through accessible agreed channels.
  • Makes room for relevant contributions without speaking for others.
  • Responds to a stated access need through the available process.

Examples

  • Provides the document before a review so participants can prepare.
  • Corrects an attribution when another person's contribution was omitted.

IC2

Designs fair participation in own work

Independently identifies who may be affected or excluded in ambiguous work and adjusts participation and decision practices.

Observable behaviors

  • Invites relevant perspectives before a decision becomes costly to change.
  • Checks whether the working format creates avoidable participation barriers.
  • Explains how differing input was considered in the final choice.

Examples

  • Adds asynchronous input to a process that had depended on one time zone.
  • Changes a test sample after identifying an affected group that was missing.

IC3

Removes systemic participation barriers

Addresses complex inclusion risks across teams by changing systems that repeatedly limit fair contribution or consideration.

Observable behaviors

  • Uses evidence to identify recurring barriers in a shared process.
  • Builds participation checks into high-impact cross-team decisions.
  • Monitors whether a change improves access without creating hidden burdens.

Examples

  • Revises a planning process after finding that key roles consistently enter too late.
  • Adds an accessibility review point to a shared delivery standard.

Add Inclusion to your framework

Use the free builder to adapt these expectations to your participation practices, access needs, and high-impact decisions.

Build your framework

Common questions

Can inclusion be assessed fairly?

Yes, when expectations focus on observable work practices, decisions, and effects rather than presumed intent or personal identity.

Does every perspective need equal weight?

No. Relevant perspectives need fair consideration, while evidence, expertise, impact, and decision rights can affect the final weight.

How should managers handle confidential access needs?

Assess whether appropriate processes were followed without requiring private information as performance evidence.

Related resources

Competency guide

Decision quality competency

Decision quality means making timely choices with relevant evidence, clear criteria, and judgment proportionate to the stakes and uncertainty.

View competency

Competency guide

Reliability competency

Reliability means meeting agreed expectations predictably and communicating early enough to respond when a commitment is at risk.

View competency

Guide

How to write level expectations

A level expectation states the work someone at a specific role track and level is expected to handle. Write it in the present tense, identify scope, autonomy, and complexity, and make every adjacent level distinguishable through evidence. Add short behaviors and examples so managers can apply the standard consistently.

Read guide
Inclusion competency framework | Peasy HR